Wednesday, May 5, 2010

Does Saving A City Justify Killing Goliath?

A king is on the verge of being impeached and a new one about to be discovered. This is the book of Samuel I am talking about. Samuel is in charge of finding the new king due to Saul disobeying God. The king Saul failed to use a priest in his battle and therefore was being punished with impeachment. New enemies were about to be made when Samuel came across David. David was just an ordinary harp player; little did he know he would soon be king. The Philistines called war upon Israel and unleashed their kraken, Goliath was his name. David was able to defeat Goliath and save the people. This was not good news to Saul who would soon be proclaimed ex king. This reminded of the story of King Arthur. An ordinary man could do what no other could and defeat Goliath or pull out a sword from tone.
The thing about this though, wasn’t that David killed the giant, it was how he did it that was interesting to me. He killed the giant with a tiny rock. How a little thing can have such a huge impact amazes me, “And he took his staff in his hand and chose him five smooth stones out of the brook.”1 Samuel, 17:40. How a little pebble can have such an impact on such a huge thing. It is like the Chinese saying that says water can break through stone. This of course couldn’t have been done without Gods help, so the moral is to keep faithful to God.
David defeating Goliath also brought up the question of our debate last Wednesday. Do the ends justify the means? Does saving a city justify killing Goliath? Is David really a good person if his intentions are to kill? This part of the book really got me to think. I hope the story only gets better. 

No comments:

Post a Comment